From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for Oct 19 Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 15:55:19 +0200 Message-ID: <4CBDA347.6030509@redhat.com> References: <20101019021117.GI25455@sequoia.sous-sol.org> <4CBD93B8.9070002@redhat.com> <4CBD9B87.9010008@codemonkey.ws> <4CBD9CB3.5080609@redhat.com> <4CBD9E2D.6030208@codemonkey.ws> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Anthony Liguori , dlaor@redhat.com, Chris Wright , Juan Quintela , chrisw@redhat.com, "Venkateswararao Jujjuri (JV)" , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Ayal Baron To: Stefan Hajnoczi Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:47709 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752472Ab0JSNze (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Oct 2010 09:55:34 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 10/19/2010 03:38 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > bdrv_aio_freeze() or any mechanism to deal with pending requests in > the generic block code would be a good step for future "live" support > of other operations like truncate. + logical disk grow, etc. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function