From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call minutes for Oct 19
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 10:25:52 +0200
Message-ID: <4CBEA790.9050208@redhat.com>
References: <20101019151441.GA24673@x200.localdomain> <4DE00079-05FA-40DF-9EA5-9573AD745117@suse.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Chris Wright <chrisw@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org
To: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-fx0-f46.google.com ([209.85.161.46]:43926 "EHLO
	mail-fx0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1752136Ab0JTIZ4 (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 20 Oct 2010 04:25:56 -0400
Received: by fxm4 with SMTP id 4so2459769fxm.19
        for <kvm@vger.kernel.org>; Wed, 20 Oct 2010 01:25:55 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4DE00079-05FA-40DF-9EA5-9573AD745117@suse.de>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On 10/20/2010 10:21 AM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> Would it be realistic to declare deprecating the qemu-kvm fork for
> 0.14 as goal?

I recall some performance problems with the qemu.git iothread, I'm not 
sure all of those have been fixed.

Paolo