From: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
To: Chris Wright <chrisw@redhat.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
"dlaor@redhat.com" <dlaor@redhat.com>,
"Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>,
"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call minutes for Oct 19
Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 12:39:33 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CC1CC55.2040700@codemonkey.ws> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20101022172916.GF27794@x200.localdomain>
On 10/22/2010 12:29 PM, Chris Wright wrote:
> * Anthony Liguori (anthony@codemonkey.ws) wrote:
>
>> The first step is just identifying what interfaces we need in a
>> guest agent. So far, I think we can get away with a very small
>> number of interfaces (mainly read/write files, execute command).
>>
> Could you elaborate here? I can't imagine you mean:
>
> vm_system(target_vm, "shutdown -r now")
>
> But from other post, it does seem you want complexity in the host side
> not guest side of agent.
>
> Seems vm_reboot(target_vm) as the RPC makes more sense with the guest
> side implementing that in whatever guest-specific appropriate way.
>
What I really want is a vm_system API that a guest agent MUST implement
and then APIs like vm_reboot that a guest agent MAY implement.
In my mind, the guest agent lives in the distros even though it's built
from QEMU source tree. We don't install it ourselves.
That means we might have a new funky fresh version of Fedora 21 version
of QEMU but running an old Fedora 14 guest with a really back-level
guest agent.
Having very low level APIs with logic that primarily lives in QEMU gives
us the ability to support new features in QEMU with older guests.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-22 17:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-19 15:14 KVM call minutes for Oct 19 Chris Wright
2010-10-20 8:21 ` [Qemu-devel] " Alexander Graf
2010-10-20 8:25 ` Paolo Bonzini
2010-10-20 8:30 ` Alexander Graf
2010-10-20 10:47 ` Avi Kivity
2010-10-20 12:16 ` Dor Laor
2010-10-21 10:22 ` Andrew Beekhof
2010-10-21 10:26 ` Dor Laor
2010-10-21 13:09 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-10-21 13:18 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2010-10-21 13:32 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-10-21 15:43 ` Andrew Beekhof
2010-10-21 16:25 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-10-21 16:37 ` Chris Wright
2010-10-21 19:47 ` Andrew Beekhof
2010-10-20 13:02 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-10-20 13:19 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2010-10-20 13:21 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-10-20 22:46 ` Dor Laor
2010-10-21 1:14 ` Alexander Graf
2010-10-21 7:45 ` Paolo Bonzini
2010-10-21 13:02 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-10-21 13:05 ` Dor Laor
2010-10-22 17:29 ` Chris Wright
2010-10-22 17:39 ` Anthony Liguori [this message]
2010-10-22 18:20 ` Chris Wright
2010-10-22 18:53 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-10-23 0:06 ` Chris Wright
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CC1CC55.2040700@codemonkey.ws \
--to=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=chrisw@redhat.com \
--cc=dlaor@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox