From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Type-safe ioport callbacks Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2010 19:35:47 +0200 Message-ID: <4CC46E73.2090704@redhat.com> References: <1287934469-16624-1-git-send-email-avi@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Anthony Liguori , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org To: Avi Kivity Return-path: Received: from mail-bw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.214.46]:40552 "EHLO mail-bw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932203Ab0JXRfw (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Oct 2010 13:35:52 -0400 Received: by bwz11 with SMTP id 11so1786154bwz.19 for ; Sun, 24 Oct 2010 10:35:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1287934469-16624-1-git-send-email-avi@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 10/24/2010 05:34 PM, Avi Kivity wrote: > A recent qemu -> qemu-kvm merge broke cpu hotplug without the compiler > complaining because of the type-unsafeness of the ioport callbacks. This > patchset adds a type-safe variant of ioport callbacks and coverts a sample > ioport. Converting the other 300-odd registrations is left as an excercise > to the community. Should we create a Documentation/ file with incomplete transitions and the commit(s) that introduced them, for volunteers who wish to do some dirty work or to learn Coccinelle? Paolo