From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [patch 0/5] use upstream x86 state save/restore code Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2010 11:56:19 +0200 Message-ID: <4CC55443.9000409@redhat.com> References: <20101023220524.049191736@amt.cnet> <4CC438AE.4010202@redhat.com> <20101024210501.GA12288@amt.cnet> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, gleb@redhat.com To: Marcelo Tosatti Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:18580 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754834Ab0JYJ4X (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Oct 2010 05:56:23 -0400 Received: from int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx01.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.11]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o9P9uMa7005030 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2010 05:56:23 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20101024210501.GA12288@amt.cnet> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 10/24/2010 11:05 PM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 03:46:22PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote: > > On 10/24/2010 12:05 AM, Marcelo Tosatti wrote: > > > > > > Presumably you did a line-by-line verification that nothing is lost? > > Yes, missing parts were sent upstream in the last uq/master pull > request (which is already merged). > Great, thanks, this stuff makes me nervous. All applied. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function