From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [SeaBIOS] [PATCH] mark irq9 active high in DSDT Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2010 15:27:58 +0200 Message-ID: <4CC828DE.9050908@redhat.com> References: <20101020093441.GP10207@redhat.com> <20101021020020.GA21095@morn.localdomain> <4CC010D5.7070103@redhat.com> <20101023141207.GA2165@morn.localdomain> <4CC56188.1090702@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: KVM list , seabios@seabios.org, qemu-devel , "Justin M. Forbes" , Anthony Liguori To: "Kevin O'Connor" Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:8776 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756640Ab0J0N2T (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Oct 2010 09:28:19 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4CC56188.1090702@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 10/25/2010 12:52 PM, Avi Kivity wrote: >> I'm okay with making tags and branches of seabios for bug fixes. So >> far qemu/kvm has just grabbed various builds of seabios - is it >> worthwhile to branch off of the seabios-0.6.1 version - which would >> mean qemu/kvm would pull in additional changes beyond the bug fix >> above? > > > qemu 0.12 is based on 0.5.1-stable, appears to be an untagged commit > qemu 0.13 is based on 17d3e46511, doesn't appear to be a part of a > branch or a tag? > > git-wise, tags are more important than branches. You can always > retrofit a branch to a tag (and you can always retrofit a tag to a > commit hash). For the qemu git repositories, neither matter so much > since the commit is recorded in git; but the distro people really like > nice stable tags with lots of digits and dots in them. > On the last kvm conf call Anthony said that he'll be happy to include an updated seabios with qemu 0.13.1, so a new release would be appreciated. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function