From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: kvm unhandled exit 4400 Date: Sat, 06 Nov 2010 13:35:21 -0400 Message-ID: <4CD591D9.7000903@redhat.com> References: <20101102210100.GB13929@wuzzy.fuzzbuzz.org> <4CD12C28.20208@gmail.com> <20101103194410.GA3004@fuzzdora.tablet> <4CD1D116.1080908@msgid.tls.msk.ru> <4CD485F4.4020401@msgid.tls.msk.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Khaled El Mously , haishan , kvm@vger.kernel.org To: Michael Tokarev Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:50808 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751077Ab0KFRf3 (ORCPT ); Sat, 6 Nov 2010 13:35:29 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4CD485F4.4020401@msgid.tls.msk.ru> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 11/05/2010 06:32 PM, Michael Tokarev wrote: > > > > Um. Please excuse me but this is a complete bullshit. > > As others pointed out, this is too harsh. It wasn't > intentional to be extra harsh here, it was just me > not realizing how harsh such a statement is, as > English is not my native language and I dont use it > much. Far more appropriate word for this context > is "nonsense". I apologize for using inappropriate > words. May I suggest "wrong" or "incorrect"? -- I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this signature is too narrow to contain.