public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>, kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/9] KVM: Clear assigned guest IRQ on release
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 12:20:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CD92E6B.5010000@siemens.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CD92950.1070309@redhat.com>

Am 09.11.2010 11:58, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 11/08/2010 01:21 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> When we deassign a guest IRQ, clear the potentially asserted guest line.
>> There might be no chance for the guest to do this, specifically if we
>> switch from INTx to MSI mode.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka<jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
>> ---
>>   virt/kvm/assigned-dev.c |    3 +++
>>   1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/virt/kvm/assigned-dev.c b/virt/kvm/assigned-dev.c
>> index 7c98928..ecc4419 100644
>> --- a/virt/kvm/assigned-dev.c
>> +++ b/virt/kvm/assigned-dev.c
>> @@ -141,6 +141,9 @@ static void deassign_guest_irq(struct kvm *kvm,
>>   	kvm_unregister_irq_ack_notifier(kvm,&assigned_dev->ack_notifier);
>>   	assigned_dev->ack_notifier.gsi = -1;
>>
>> +	kvm_set_irq(assigned_dev->kvm, assigned_dev->irq_source_id,
>> +		    assigned_dev->guest_irq, 0);
>> +
>>   	if (assigned_dev->irq_source_id != -1)
>>   		kvm_free_irq_source_id(kvm, assigned_dev->irq_source_id);
>>   	assigned_dev->irq_source_id = -1;
> 
> I guess this can't hurt.  Did you see it happen in practice?

Yes, with prefer_msi=off and an e1000e-driven NIC: The legacy IRQ stayed
asserted when the guest actually enabled MSI.

Jan

-- 
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux

  reply	other threads:[~2010-11-09 11:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-11-08 11:21 [PATCH v4 0/9] KVM: Improve IRQ assignment for device passthrough Jan Kiszka
2010-11-08 11:21 ` [PATCH v4 1/9] KVM: Fix srcu struct leakage Jan Kiszka
2010-11-08 17:00   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-11-08 17:32     ` Jan Kiszka
2010-11-08 11:21 ` [PATCH v4 2/9] KVM: Switch IRQ subsystem to SRCU Jan Kiszka
2010-11-09 10:49   ` Avi Kivity
2010-11-09 11:21     ` Jan Kiszka
2010-11-08 11:21 ` [PATCH v4 3/9] KVM: Clear assigned guest IRQ on release Jan Kiszka
2010-11-09 10:58   ` Avi Kivity
2010-11-09 11:20     ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2010-11-09 18:36     ` Alex Williamson
2010-11-10  6:53       ` Avi Kivity
2010-11-26 10:36         ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-11-08 11:21 ` [PATCH v4 4/9] KVM: Switch assigned device IRQ forwarding to threaded handler Jan Kiszka
2010-11-09 12:26   ` Avi Kivity
2010-11-09 12:36     ` Jan Kiszka
2010-11-08 11:21 ` [PATCH v4 5/9] KVM: Refactor IRQ names of assigned devices Jan Kiszka
2010-11-08 11:21 ` [PATCH v4 6/9] KVM: Save/restore state of assigned PCI device Jan Kiszka
2010-11-09 12:35   ` Avi Kivity
2010-11-09 13:29     ` Jan Kiszka
2010-11-09 13:36       ` Avi Kivity
2010-11-09 13:44         ` Jan Kiszka
2010-11-09 13:46           ` Avi Kivity
2010-11-09 16:41             ` Don Dutile
2010-11-08 11:21 ` [PATCH v4 7/9] KVM: Clean up kvm_vm_ioctl_assigned_device Jan Kiszka
2010-11-08 11:21 ` [PATCH v4 8/9] KVM: Document device assigment API Jan Kiszka
2010-11-08 11:21 ` [PATCH v4 9/9] KVM: Allow host IRQ sharing for passed-through PCI 2.3 devices Jan Kiszka
2010-11-09 13:27   ` Avi Kivity
2010-11-09 13:35     ` Jan Kiszka
2010-11-09 13:41       ` Avi Kivity
2010-11-09 14:11         ` Jan Kiszka
2010-11-09 14:20           ` Avi Kivity
2010-11-16 16:55 ` [PATCH v4 0/9] KVM: Improve IRQ assignment for device passthrough Marcelo Tosatti
2010-11-16 18:26   ` Jan Kiszka
2010-11-17  8:25     ` Avi Kivity

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4CD92E6B.5010000@siemens.com \
    --to=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox