From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>, kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 9/9] KVM: Allow host IRQ sharing for passed-through PCI 2.3 devices
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 15:27:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CD94C5A.1080504@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <940e3dc8062aa1c9810b5a6eb3e6dd086abc7d59.1289215310.git.jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
On 11/08/2010 01:21 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> PCI 2.3 allows to generically disable IRQ sources at device level. This
> enables us to share IRQs of such devices between on the host side when
> passing them to a guest. This feature is optional, user space has to
> request it explicitly. Moreover, user space can inform us about its view
> of PCI_COMMAND_INTX_DISABLE so that we can avoid unmasking the interrupt
> and signaling it if the guest masked it via the PCI config space.
>
It's a pity this cannot be done transparently. We could detect multiple
devices sharing the line, but what about PCI_COMMAND_INTX_DISABLE?
Perhaps we can hook the kernel's handler for this bit?
>
> /* Depends on KVM_CAP_IOMMU */
> #define KVM_DEV_ASSIGN_ENABLE_IOMMU (1<< 0)
> +/* The following two depend on KVM_CAP_PCI_2_3 */
> +#define KVM_DEV_ASSIGN_PCI_2_3 (1<< 1)
> +#define KVM_DEV_ASSIGN_MASK_INTX (1<< 2)
> +
> +If KVM_DEV_ASSIGN_PCI_2_3 is set, the kernel will manage legacy INTx interrupts
> +via the PCI-2.3-compliant device-level mask, thus enable IRQ sharing with other
> +assigned devices or host devices. KVM_DEV_ASSIGN_MASK_INTX specifies the
> +guest's view on the INTx mask, see KVM_ASSIGN_SET_INTX_MASK for details.
>
> 4.48 KVM_DEASSIGN_PCI_DEVICE
>
> @@ -1263,6 +1271,23 @@ struct kvm_assigned_msix_entry {
> __u16 padding[3];
> };
>
> +5.54 KVM_ASSIGN_SET_INTX_MASK
4.54?
(54? wow.)
> +
> +Capability: KVM_CAP_PCI_2_3
> +Architectures: x86
> +Type: vm ioctl
> +Parameters: struct kvm_assigned_pci_dev (in)
> +Returns: 0 on success, -1 on error
> +
> +Informs the kernel about the guest's view on the INTx mask. As long as the
> +guest masks the legacy INTx, the kernel will refrain from unmasking it at
> +hardware level and will not assert the guest's IRQ line. User space is still
> +responsible for applying this state to the assigned device's real config space.
What if userspace lies?
> +
> +See KVM_ASSIGN_DEV_IRQ for the data structure. The target device is specified
> +by assigned_dev_id. In the flags field, only KVM_DEV_ASSIGN_MASK_INTX is
> +evaluated.
> +
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/kvm_host.h b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> index fe83eb0..7f1627c 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kvm_host.h
> @@ -468,6 +468,7 @@ struct kvm_assigned_dev_kernel {
> unsigned int entries_nr;
> int host_irq;
> bool host_irq_disabled;
> + bool pci_2_3;
> struct msix_entry *host_msix_entries;
> int guest_irq;
> struct msix_entry *guest_msix_entries;
> @@ -477,6 +478,7 @@ struct kvm_assigned_dev_kernel {
> struct pci_dev *dev;
> struct kvm *kvm;
> spinlock_t intx_lock;
> + struct mutex intx_mask_lock;
> char irq_name[32];
> };
I saw no reason this can't be a spinlock, but perhaps I missed
something. This would allow us to avoid srcu, which is slightly more
expensive than rcu. Since pci 2.3 assigned devices are not a major use
case, I'd like not to penalize the mainstream users for this.
This patch undoes some of the niceness of the previous patches, but I
have no alternative to suggest.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-09 13:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-08 11:21 [PATCH v4 0/9] KVM: Improve IRQ assignment for device passthrough Jan Kiszka
2010-11-08 11:21 ` [PATCH v4 1/9] KVM: Fix srcu struct leakage Jan Kiszka
2010-11-08 17:00 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-11-08 17:32 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-11-08 11:21 ` [PATCH v4 2/9] KVM: Switch IRQ subsystem to SRCU Jan Kiszka
2010-11-09 10:49 ` Avi Kivity
2010-11-09 11:21 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-11-08 11:21 ` [PATCH v4 3/9] KVM: Clear assigned guest IRQ on release Jan Kiszka
2010-11-09 10:58 ` Avi Kivity
2010-11-09 11:20 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-11-09 18:36 ` Alex Williamson
2010-11-10 6:53 ` Avi Kivity
2010-11-26 10:36 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2010-11-08 11:21 ` [PATCH v4 4/9] KVM: Switch assigned device IRQ forwarding to threaded handler Jan Kiszka
2010-11-09 12:26 ` Avi Kivity
2010-11-09 12:36 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-11-08 11:21 ` [PATCH v4 5/9] KVM: Refactor IRQ names of assigned devices Jan Kiszka
2010-11-08 11:21 ` [PATCH v4 6/9] KVM: Save/restore state of assigned PCI device Jan Kiszka
2010-11-09 12:35 ` Avi Kivity
2010-11-09 13:29 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-11-09 13:36 ` Avi Kivity
2010-11-09 13:44 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-11-09 13:46 ` Avi Kivity
2010-11-09 16:41 ` Don Dutile
2010-11-08 11:21 ` [PATCH v4 7/9] KVM: Clean up kvm_vm_ioctl_assigned_device Jan Kiszka
2010-11-08 11:21 ` [PATCH v4 8/9] KVM: Document device assigment API Jan Kiszka
2010-11-08 11:21 ` [PATCH v4 9/9] KVM: Allow host IRQ sharing for passed-through PCI 2.3 devices Jan Kiszka
2010-11-09 13:27 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2010-11-09 13:35 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-11-09 13:41 ` Avi Kivity
2010-11-09 14:11 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-11-09 14:20 ` Avi Kivity
2010-11-16 16:55 ` [PATCH v4 0/9] KVM: Improve IRQ assignment for device passthrough Marcelo Tosatti
2010-11-16 18:26 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-11-17 8:25 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CD94C5A.1080504@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox