From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>, kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: Fix srcu struct leakage
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 16:30:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CD95AF0.4010406@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CD955AA.8040604@siemens.com>
On 11/09/2010 04:07 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >
> > kvm_iommu_unmap_guest enters SRCU critical section, and "struct kvm" is
> > freed at the end of kvm_arch_destroy_vm. Thats why its not in generic
> > code.
>
> The problem is the arch-specific allocation of the kvm object on IA64.
> All others simply call kmalloc/kzalloc for the struct itself, but IA64
> embeds it into some larger context. Not sure why, though.
ia64 virt is special - the guest has a virtual address space for host
data. This data is shared with the host address space, but on different
addresses.
I guess to reduce tlb costs ia64 kvm uses a large order allocation for
both struct kvm and other random data, which is why the allocation is
different.
It could be refactored to something like
#ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_SPECIAL_KVM_ALLOC
static inline struct kvm *kvm_arch_alloc_vm(void)
{
return kzalloc(...);
}
static inline void kvm_arch_free_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
{
kfree(kvm);
}
#endif
and have ia64 provide its special stuff. The practice of duplicating
common code just because of one outlier is bad, there are better ways.
(and I will accept untested ia64 patches provided kvm-ia64@ is copied).
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-09 14:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-09 11:41 [PATCH] KVM: Fix srcu struct leakage Jan Kiszka
2010-11-09 13:30 ` Avi Kivity
2010-11-09 13:53 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-11-09 13:59 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-11-09 14:03 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-11-09 14:07 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-11-09 14:30 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2010-11-09 14:36 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-11-09 16:00 ` Avi Kivity
2010-11-09 14:05 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-11-09 14:00 ` Avi Kivity
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2010-11-07 12:58 Jan Kiszka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CD95AF0.4010406@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox