From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Don Dutile <ddutile@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/9] KVM: Save/restore state of assigned PCI device
Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 11:41:37 -0500
Message-ID: <4CD979C1.9060500@redhat.com>
References: <cover.1289215310.git.jan.kiszka@siemens.com> <1323c55899273c3bfc746fda9b47948aca6eae2f.1289215310.git.jan.kiszka@siemens.com> <4CD94021.4090705@redhat.com> <4CD94CBB.8030105@siemens.com> <4CD94E5C.9050909@redhat.com> <4CD95044.4040402@siemens.com> <4CD950C0.4020201@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:13921 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1752607Ab0KIQlj (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 9 Nov 2010 11:41:39 -0500
In-Reply-To: <4CD950C0.4020201@redhat.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 11/09/2010 03:44 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> >
>> >  Oh yes, I read the code but it didn't register.  Of course this change
>> >  is quite necessary.
>> >
>> >  (I understood you to mean that the PCI 2.3 reset doesn't reset
>> >  everything, but that isn't what you said).
>>
>> What the hardware makes out of the reset is even another story. No
>> guarantees I bet (isn't function-level reset an optional thing anyway?).
> 
> It is.
> 
optional for PF's; mandatory for VFs.