From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>, kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] qemu-kvm: Drop vga dirty logging workarounds
Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 15:29:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CE135CA.4060507@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CE1350C.3080304@siemens.com>
On 11/15/2010 03:26 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Am 15.11.2010 14:16, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > On 11/15/2010 12:32 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >> These diffs to upstream should all date back to the days qemu-kvm
> >> supported vga dirty logging with restricted/broken kvm kernel modules.
> >> We no longer do, so there is no need for those workarounds. Even worse
> >> they can trigger internal bug checks these days:
> >>
> >> BUG: kvm_dirty_pages_log_change: invalid parameters 00000000000a8000-00000000000affff
> >
> > I'd like to apply this. What kind of testing has this seen? autotest
> > likely isn't a good enough test.
>
> No systematic testing.
>
> It's based on the fact that I'm not aware of any VGA issues in upstream
> when KVM is enabled,
I don't think upstream+kvm sees a lot of testing.
> on the fact that explicit log enable/disable became
> obsolete when switching to upstream's logging backend, and the annoying
> BUG messages only issued under qemu-kvm. There just remains a slight
> uncertainty about what mark_dirty and s[123] were once doing - or may
> still be useful for.
I remember re-adding some kvm-specific dirty logging code after
regressions were uncovered, so I'm a little worried. I guess we can
risk it, we can always revert it (or fix) if it turns out badly.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-11-15 13:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-11-15 10:32 [RFC][PATCH] qemu-kvm: Drop vga dirty logging workarounds Jan Kiszka
2010-11-15 13:16 ` Avi Kivity
2010-11-15 13:26 ` Jan Kiszka
2010-11-15 13:29 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CE135CA.4060507@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox