public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Cc: Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp>,
	mtosatti@redhat.com, laijs@cn.fujitsu.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	takuya.yoshikawa@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] KVM: count the number of dirty bits for each memslot
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 15:14:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CE526AA.8070705@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CE525BC.7020906@siemens.com>

On 11/18/2010 03:10 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> Am 18.11.2010 13:54, Avi Kivity wrote:
> >  On 11/18/2010 07:14 AM, Takuya Yoshikawa wrote:
> >>  This patch introduces the counter to hold the number of dirty bits in
> >>  each
> >>  memslot. We will use this to optimize dirty logging later.
> >>
> >>
> >>  @@ -3217,11 +3216,8 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_get_dirty_log(struct kvm *kvm,
> >>
> >>        n = kvm_dirty_bitmap_bytes(memslot);
> >>
> >>  -    for (i = 0; !is_dirty&&   i<   n/sizeof(long); i++)
> >>  -        is_dirty = memslot->dirty_bitmap[i];
> >>  -
> >
> >  This can already be an improvement.
>
> /Me wonders if it wouldn't make sense to expand this optimization to the
> user space interface as well, i.e. signaling "there are no dirty pages"
> via some flag instead of writing zeros in a bitmap. Of course, this
> means supporting both interfaces for a longer period.

An 8MB framebuffer is 2K bits, or 256 bytes wide.  Comparing 256 cache 
hot bytes against zero is not worth a new interface.

Larger memory slots are very unlikely to be always unmodified.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function


  reply	other threads:[~2010-11-18 13:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-11-18  5:12 [RFC PATCH 0/2] KVM: dirty logging optimization Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-11-18  5:14 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] KVM: count the number of dirty bits for each memslot Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-11-18 12:54   ` Avi Kivity
2010-11-18 13:10     ` Jan Kiszka
2010-11-18 13:14       ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2010-11-18  5:15 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] KVM: selective write protection using dirty bitmap Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-11-18 13:06   ` Avi Kivity
2010-11-19  8:30     ` Takuya Yoshikawa

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4CE526AA.8070705@redhat.com \
    --to=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=laijs@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=takuya.yoshikawa@gmail.com \
    --cc=yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox