From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [PATCH kvm-unit-tests 2/4] Introduce a C++ wrapper for the kvm APIs Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 18:34:00 +0200 Message-ID: <4CED3E78.9020208@redhat.com> References: <1290595933-13122-1-git-send-email-avi@redhat.com> <1290595933-13122-3-git-send-email-avi@redhat.com> <50DD1E97-0ECD-41E6-B6F8-1D78AA4A4876@suse.de> <4CED3D83.6020609@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Alexander Graf , Marcelo Tosatti , kvm@vger.kernel.org To: Jes Sorensen Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:26805 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753812Ab0KXQeF (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Nov 2010 11:34:05 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4CED3D83.6020609@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 11/24/2010 06:29 PM, Jes Sorensen wrote: > > > > FWIW, I still disagree with C++ and believe this code to be hardly readable. > > YUCK! > > It's got :'s all over the place that makes no sense whatsoever :( You've got two in one sentence! Practice what you preach. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function