From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [PATCH kvm-unit-tests 2/4] Introduce a C++ wrapper for the kvm APIs Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 19:29:33 +0200 Message-ID: <4CED4B7D.3030002@redhat.com> References: <1290595933-13122-1-git-send-email-avi@redhat.com> <1290595933-13122-3-git-send-email-avi@redhat.com> <50DD1E97-0ECD-41E6-B6F8-1D78AA4A4876@suse.de> <4CED2416.1040102@codemonkey.ws> <20101124154006.GE15111@redhat.com> <4CED344B.3030000@codemonkey.ws> <4CED3FE6.50900@redhat.com> <4CED41A0.8060003@redhat.com> <4CED4276.9090103@redhat.com> <4CED43FF.4030201@codemonkey.ws> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jes Sorensen , Gleb Natapov , Alexander Graf , Marcelo Tosatti , kvm@vger.kernel.org To: Anthony Liguori Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:64055 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750817Ab0KXR3k (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Nov 2010 12:29:40 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4CED43FF.4030201@codemonkey.ws> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 11/24/2010 06:57 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: >> It's a question of how it is accessed, if it is treated like an ISA >> device by the silicon, we should treat it like an ISA device in QEMU, >> rather than pretend it is something that it isn't. > > Does anyone have any evidence that the i8042 has anything to do with > the ISA bus at all other than the fact that people have some weird > notion in their head that if a pio/mmio operation isn't for a PCI > device, it must be ISA? > It cannot be an ISA device since ISA does not provide a way to assert IRQ1. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function