Re: [PATCH kvm-unit-tests 2/4] Introduce a C++ wrapper for the kvm APIs

[Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>]

On 11/24/2010 07:33 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> >
> >  But I don't see the point.  If you look at my repository, there's
> The point is that C++ is ugly language. The short code Avi sent remind
> me perl (aka line noise). It is almost impossible to parse it into
> what code it actually does. Most symbols are there for C++ syntax not
> functionality.

No.  They're there for error handling.  A C++ wrapper, doesn't add any 
functionality, so you can say that all of the lines of codes do nothing 
and are just syntax.  But they do allow you to pair init and uninit (in 
the constructor and destructor).  When you use the wrapper (as opposed 
to the bare C interface) you get the value by not having to code long 
error handling sequences (with a high probability of getting them wrong 
and never finding out in testing).

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function