From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [PATCHv6 00/16] boot order specification Date: Sat, 27 Nov 2010 22:56:10 +0200 Message-ID: <4CF1706A.3000507@redhat.com> References: <1290012243-6087-1-git-send-email-gleb@redhat.com> <20101123153141.GD25606@redhat.com> <4CEBE7F4.9080200@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Gleb Natapov , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, blauwirbel@gmail.com, armbru@redhat.com, alex.williamson@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com, kevin@koconnor.net, Anthony Liguori To: Anthony Liguori Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:61288 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753545Ab0K0U4h (ORCPT ); Sat, 27 Nov 2010 15:56:37 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4CEBE7F4.9080200@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 11/23/2010 06:12 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: > On 11/23/2010 09:31 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote: >> Anthony, Blue >> >> No comments on this patch series for almost a week. Can it be applied? > > Does that mean everyone's happy or have folks not gotten around to > review it? > > IOW, last call if you have objections :-) > I haven't reviewed this - I trust the author and maintainers to get it right. But I notice the there is no documentation - surely some is needed? -- I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this signature is too narrow to contain.