From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Anthony Liguori <anthony@codemonkey.ws>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Juan Quintela <quintela@trasno.org>,
kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 09/10] Exit loop if we have been there too long
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2010 14:40:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4CF6422C.3030308@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CF50F2C.7090503@codemonkey.ws>
On 11/30/2010 04:50 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> That's what the patch set I was alluding to did. Or maybe I imagined
>> the whole thing.
>
>
> No, it just split the main bitmap into three bitmaps. I'm suggesting
> that we have the dirty interface have two implementations, one that
> refers to the 8-bit bitmap when TCG in use and another one that uses
> the KVM representation.
>
> TCG really needs multiple dirty bits but KVM doesn't. A shared
> implementation really can't be optimal.
Live migration and the framebuffer can certainly share code with kvm and
tcg:
- tcg or kvm maintain an internal bitmap (kvm in the kernel, tcg updates
a private bitmap)
- a dirty log client wants to see an updated bitmap; migration on a new
pass, vga on screen refresh
- ask the producer (kvm or tcg) to fetch-and-clear a dirty bitmap
- broadcast it ( |= ) into any active clients (migration or framebuffer)
- everyone's happy
The code dirty thing might need special treatment, we can have a special
tcg-only bitmap for it.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-01 12:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <cover.1290552026.git.quintela@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <9b23b9b4cee242591bdb356c838a9cfb9af033c1.1290552026.git.quintela@redhat.com>
[not found] ` <4CF45D67.5010906@codemonkey.ws>
[not found] ` <4CF4A478.8080209@redhat.com>
2010-11-30 13:47 ` [PATCH 09/10] Exit loop if we have been there too long Anthony Liguori
2010-11-30 13:58 ` Avi Kivity
2010-11-30 14:17 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-11-30 14:27 ` Avi Kivity
2010-11-30 14:50 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-12-01 12:40 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2010-11-30 17:43 ` Juan Quintela
2010-12-01 1:20 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-12-01 1:52 ` Juan Quintela
2010-12-01 2:22 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-12-01 12:35 ` Avi Kivity
2010-12-01 13:45 ` Juan Quintela
2010-12-02 1:31 ` Takuya Yoshikawa
2010-12-02 8:37 ` Avi Kivity
2010-11-30 14:12 ` Paolo Bonzini
2010-11-30 15:00 ` Anthony Liguori
2010-11-30 17:59 ` Juan Quintela
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4CF6422C.3030308@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=anthony@codemonkey.ws \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
--cc=quintela@trasno.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox