From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] nmi: make cpu-index argument optional
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 14:05:56 +0800
Message-ID: <4D1043C4.8000108@cn.fujitsu.com>
References: <4D0EF39A.4030406@cn.fujitsu.com> <m3aak02xf5.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	aliguori@us.ibm.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Markus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from cn.fujitsu.com ([222.73.24.84]:57881 "EHLO song.cn.fujitsu.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-FAIL-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751797Ab0LUGEb (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 21 Dec 2010 01:04:31 -0500
In-Reply-To: <m3aak02xf5.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On 12/21/2010 12:58 AM, Markus Armbruster wrote:
> Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com> writes:
> 
>> When the argument "cpu-index" is not given,
>> then "nmi" command will inject NMI on all CPUs.
>>
>> This simulate the nmi button on physical machine.
>>
>> Signed-off-by:  Lai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
>> ---
>> diff --git a/hmp-commands.hx b/hmp-commands.hx
>> index 8de7aa3..d8fe4c0 100644
>> --- a/hmp-commands.hx
>> +++ b/hmp-commands.hx
>> @@ -721,9 +721,9 @@ ETEXI
>>  #if defined(TARGET_I386)
>>      {
>>          .name       = "nmi",
>> -        .args_type  = "cpu-index:i",
>> -        .params     = "cpu",
>> -        .help       = "inject an NMI on the given CPU",
>> +        .args_type  = "cpu-index:i?",
>> +        .params     = "[cpu]",
>> +        .help       = "inject an NMI on all CPUs or the given CPU",
>>          .mhandler.cmd = do_inject_nmi,
>>      },
>>  #endif
>> diff --git a/monitor.c b/monitor.c
>> index c16b39d..45a8dc2 100644
>> --- a/monitor.c
>> +++ b/monitor.c
>> @@ -2410,7 +2410,13 @@ static void do_wav_capture(Monitor *mon, const QDict *qdict)
>>  static void do_inject_nmi(Monitor *mon, const QDict *qdict)
>>  {
>>      CPUState *env;
>> -    int cpu_index = qdict_get_int(qdict, "cpu-index");
>> +    int cpu_index = qdict_get_try_int(qdict, "cpu-index", -1);
> 
> Note that we interpret "nmi -1" as "nmi" (no argument).  Doesn't matter
> now.  Does matter after the next patch, because that patch makes the
> command when the argument doesn't make sense.  Except it doesn't for the
> non-sensical argument -1.  Same problem with every existing use of
> qdict_get_try_int() in the monitor.  Do we care?
> 

Good catch!! I will fix it.

Tanks,
Lai.