From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: Antwort: Re: Passthrough VIA CPU Features Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2010 16:18:39 +0200 Message-ID: <4D18A03F.2020309@redhat.com> References: <4D188C91.2060604@redhat.com>, Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org To: Nico Prenzel Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:16427 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753880Ab0L0OSo (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Dec 2010 09:18:44 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 12/27/2010 04:05 PM, Nico Prenzel wrote: > Hello Avi, > > thanks for your quick respone. That doesn't sound bad! > I've found the needed documentation (I think): > http://www.via.com.tw/en/downloads/whitepapers/initiatives/padlock/programming_guide.pdf > > As my C knowloedge isn't hardware related, i don't understand what to look for. Of course, I'll read through it to gather some informations. > But I don't think I'll finish... Pherhaps someone could grab this and implements the needed changes. Often, the processor vendors implement vendor specific features. That's certainly the usual case with kvm. Try contacting Via. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function