From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 18/19] Introduce -k option to enable FT migration mode (Kemari). Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2010 19:11:52 +0200 Message-ID: <4D18C8D8.1000909@redhat.com> References: <1293438337-21377-1-git-send-email-tamura.yoshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp> <1293438337-21377-19-git-send-email-tamura.yoshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp> <20101227085617.GA22317@redhat.com> <20101227093237.GA23150@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Michael S. Tsirkin" , kwolf@redhat.com, aliguori@us.ibm.com, dlaor@redhat.com, ananth@in.ibm.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, ohmura.kei@lab.ntt.co.jp, mtosatti@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com, psuriset@linux.vnet.ibm.com, stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com To: Yoshiaki Tamura Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:19400 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753323Ab0L0RMi (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Dec 2010 12:12:38 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 12/27/2010 01:07 PM, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote: > >> > >> > Not sure whether we need to mention the codename here: is it likely to > >> > help the users? > >> > >> Ah:-) Just didn't know what the official name should be, and > >> placed Kemari for convenience. Any ideas or preference here? > >> > >> Yoshi > > > > Do we need a name? Fault tolerance mode insufficient? > > Not really. Let's call it Fault Tolerance mode from now:-) Then -k becomes meaningless. Rename to -fault-tolerant? -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function