From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2][RFC] KVM: Emulate MSI-X table and PBA in kernel
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2010 11:30:12 +0200
Message-ID: <4D1C5124.2090409@redhat.com>
References: <1293007495-32325-1-git-send-email-sheng@linux.intel.com> <201012291655.19535.sheng@linux.intel.com> <20101229092824.GA2876@redhat.com> <201012301532.42341.sheng@linux.intel.com> <20101230074748.GB7889@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Sheng Yang <sheng@linux.intel.com>,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:30575 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751318Ab0L3JaR (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 30 Dec 2010 04:30:17 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20101230074748.GB7889@redhat.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On 12/30/2010 09:47 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> I am not really suggesting this. What I say is PBA is unimplemented
> let us not commit to an interface yet.

What happens to a guest that tries to use PBA?  It's a mandatory part of 
MSI-X, no?

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function