From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: john cooper <john.cooper@redhat.com>
Cc: KVM list <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Handle guest access to BBL_CR_CTL3 MSR
Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2011 14:25:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D29A923.7020704@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D27F08A.2090209@redhat.com>
On 01/08/2011 07:05 AM, john cooper wrote:
> A correction to Intel cpu model CPUID data (patch queued)
> caused winxp-64 to BSOD when booted with a Penryn model.
> This was traced to the CPUID "model" field correction from
> 6 -> 23 (as is proper for a Penryn class of cpu). Only in
> this case does the problem surface.
>
> The cause for this failure is winxp accessing the BBL_CR_CTL3
> MSR which is unsupported by current kvm, appears to be a
> legacy MSR not fully characterized yet existing in current
> silicon, and is apparently carried forward in MSR space to
> accommodate vintage code as here. It is not yet conclusive
> whether this MSR implements any of its legacy functionality
> or is just an ornamental dud for compatibility. While I
> found no silicon version specific documentation link to
> this MSR, a general description exists in Intel's developer's
> reference which agrees with the functional behavior of
> other bootloader/kernel code I've examined accessing
> BBL_CR_CTL3. Regrettably winxp-64 appears to be setting bit #19
> called out as "reserved" in the above document.
>
> So to minimally accommodate this MSR, kvm msr get will provide
> the equivalent mock data and kvm msr write will simply toss the
> guest passed data without interpretation. While this treatment
> of BBL_CR_CTL3 addresses the immediate problem, the approach may
> be modified pending clarification from Intel.
>
Looks reasonable.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-01-09 12:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-01-08 5:05 [PATCH] Handle guest access to BBL_CR_CTL3 MSR john cooper
2011-01-09 12:25 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2011-01-18 14:50 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-01-18 15:02 ` john cooper
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D29A923.7020704@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=john.cooper@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox