From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: qemu-kvm-0.13.0 - winsows 2008 - chkdisk too slow Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2011 14:39:45 +0200 Message-ID: <4D29AC91.30904@redhat.com> References: <4D258690.4070904@redhat.com> <20110106092046.GD17772@pcnci.linuxbox.cz> <4D258B18.5000402@redhat.com> <20110106094240.GE17772@pcnci.linuxbox.cz> <4D259729.2050403@redhat.com> <20110106121857.GG17772@pcnci.linuxbox.cz> <4D25C312.7010008@redhat.com> <20110106135554.GI17772@pcnci.linuxbox.cz> <4D25D3A0.5070104@redhat.com> <20110106153844.GJ17772@pcnci.linuxbox.cz> <20110109123645.GA2400@nik-comp.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: KVM list , nikola.ciprich@linuxbox.cz, "Daniel P. Berrange" To: Nikola Ciprich Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:31320 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751714Ab1AIMjw (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Jan 2011 07:39:52 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20110109123645.GA2400@nik-comp.lan> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 01/09/2011 02:36 PM, Nikola Ciprich wrote: > Avi, > I was forced to interrupt checkdisk on this machine, I tried it again > and it's reproducible (even on another (testing) W2K8 guests). > I transfered the image to testing machine where chkdsk runs OK and finished > it there. > So in case You'd like to continue debugging, I'm at Your disposal, we can create > more testing guests and play with them on host where I can reproduce. > So far thanks a lot for all the time You've spent with it. > BR > nik > What are the differences between the host the completes chkdsk and the host that fails? Hardware-wise and software-wise. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function