From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: qemu-kvm-0.13.0 - winsows 2008 - chkdisk too slow Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2011 16:13:04 +0200 Message-ID: <4D29C270.5090301@redhat.com> References: <4D258B18.5000402@redhat.com> <20110106094240.GE17772@pcnci.linuxbox.cz> <4D259729.2050403@redhat.com> <20110106121857.GG17772@pcnci.linuxbox.cz> <4D25C312.7010008@redhat.com> <20110106135554.GI17772@pcnci.linuxbox.cz> <4D25D3A0.5070104@redhat.com> <20110106153844.GJ17772@pcnci.linuxbox.cz> <20110109123645.GA2400@nik-comp.lan> <4D29AC91.30904@redhat.com> <20110109133655.GB2400@nik-comp.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: KVM list , nikola.ciprich@linuxbox.cz, "Daniel P. Berrange" To: Nikola Ciprich Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:1355 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751756Ab1AIONK (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Jan 2011 09:13:10 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20110109133655.GB2400@nik-comp.lan> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 01/09/2011 03:36 PM, Nikola Ciprich wrote: > > What are the differences between the host the completes chkdsk and the > > host that fails? Hardware-wise and software-wise. > Software-wise, I'm not aware of any, both nodes use: > - kernel 2.6.36.2 > - qemu-kvm-0.13.0 > - seabios-0.6.0 > > hardware-wise, problematic machine is older 8core, 16GB RAM, > cpuinfo snippet: > > processor : 7 > vendor_id : GenuineIntel > cpu family : 6 > model : 15 > model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5310 @ 1.60GHz Please try the newer machine, after rmmoding kvm-intel, and reloading it with the module parameter ept=0. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function