From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: qemu-kvm-0.13.0 - winsows 2008 - chkdisk too slow Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2011 16:13:37 +0200 Message-ID: <4D29C291.6070800@redhat.com> References: <20110106094240.GE17772@pcnci.linuxbox.cz> <4D259729.2050403@redhat.com> <20110106121857.GG17772@pcnci.linuxbox.cz> <4D25C312.7010008@redhat.com> <20110106135554.GI17772@pcnci.linuxbox.cz> <4D25D3A0.5070104@redhat.com> <20110106153844.GJ17772@pcnci.linuxbox.cz> <20110109123645.GA2400@nik-comp.lan> <4D29AC91.30904@redhat.com> <20110109133655.GB2400@nik-comp.lan> <20110109134413.GC2400@nik-comp.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: KVM list , nikola.ciprich@linuxbox.cz, "Daniel P. Berrange" To: Nikola Ciprich Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:16346 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751756Ab1AIONn (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Jan 2011 09:13:43 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20110109134413.GC2400@nik-comp.lan> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 01/09/2011 03:44 PM, Nikola Ciprich wrote: > On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 02:36:55PM +0100, Nikola Ciprich wrote: > > > What are the differences between the host the completes chkdsk and the > > > host that fails? Hardware-wise and software-wise. > > Software-wise, I'm not aware of any, both nodes use: > > - kernel 2.6.36.2 > > - qemu-kvm-0.13.0 > > - seabios-0.6.0 > huh, I noticed now, it's not clean 0.13.0, but 0.13.0 + patches up to 420fe74769cc67baec6f3d962dc054e2972ca3ae. > but it's the same on both machines, problematic and nonproblematic. > hope it's not problem, sorry for the mess :( It's not a problem, and in any case unlikely to cause the bug. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function