From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] kvm hypervisor : Add hypercalls to support pv-ticketlock Date: Mon, 24 Jan 2011 09:49:58 -0800 Message-ID: <4D3DBBC6.1000407@goop.org> References: <20110119164432.GA30669@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20110119171239.GB726@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1295457672.28776.144.camel@laptop> <4D373340.60608@goop.org> <20110120115958.GB11177@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4D38774B.6070704@goop.org> <20110121140208.GA13609@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4D399CBD.10506@redhat.com> <20110122061417.GA7258@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <4D3AEF7A.1050709@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com, Peter Zijlstra , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Nick Piggin , Mathieu Desnoyers , =?UTF-8?B?QW3DqXJpY28gV2FuZw==?= , Eric Dumazet , Jan Beulich , Avi Kivity , Xen-devel , "H. Peter Anvin" , Linux Virtualization , Jeremy Fitzhardinge , kvm@vger.kernel.org, suzuki@in.ibm.com To: Rik van Riel Return-path: Received: from claw.goop.org ([74.207.240.146]:42383 "EHLO claw.goop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751813Ab1AXRuG (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Jan 2011 12:50:06 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4D3AEF7A.1050709@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 01/22/2011 06:53 AM, Rik van Riel wrote: > The main question that remains is whether the PV ticketlocks are > a large enough improvement to also merge those. I expect they > will be, and we'll see so in the benchmark numbers. The pathological worst-case of ticket locks in a virtual environment isn't very hard to hit, so I expect they'll make a huge difference there. On lightly loaded systems (little or no CPU overcommit) then they should be close to a no-op. J