From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Kevin Wolf Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: KVM call agenda for Jan 25 Date: Tue, 25 Jan 2011 15:42:04 +0100 Message-ID: <4D3EE13C.3000504@redhat.com> References: <20110124132559.GA25236@x200.localdomain> <4D3DF7EA.4010807@codemonkey.ws> <20110125115727.5f2b495e@doriath> <4D3EDA27.2060408@aurel32.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Luiz Capitulino , Chris Wright , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org To: Aurelien Jarno Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:45906 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753275Ab1AYOkl (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Jan 2011 09:40:41 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4D3EDA27.2060408@aurel32.net> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Am 25.01.2011 15:11, schrieb Aurelien Jarno: > Luiz Capitulino a =E9crit : >> On Mon, 24 Jan 2011 16:06:34 -0600 >> Anthony Liguori wrote: >> >>> On 01/24/2011 07:25 AM, Chris Wright wrote: >>>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering. >>>> =20 >>> - coroutines for the block layer >>> - glib everywhere >> >> - Let's start planning our next release in advance, here's a simple = example: >> >> http://wiki.qemu.org/Planning/0.15-example >> >=20 > What about planning the 0.14 release first? From what I see on the > mailing list, we are more in a development phase than in a bug fix ph= ase > before a release. If we want to get into a bug fix phase, all we need to have is a stable-0.14 branch. It's not like creating a branch is a lot of work, i= t just didn't happen on the announced date. And I'm almost sure that when it happens, it's going to come as a surprise once again... Kevin