From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: [PATCH 19/19] migration: add a parser to accept FT migration incoming mode. Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2011 11:43:15 +0100 Message-ID: <4D43EF43.8040001@redhat.com> References: <1296199312-26334-1-git-send-email-tamura.yoshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp> <1296199312-26334-20-git-send-email-tamura.yoshiaki@lab.ntt.co.jp> <4D42BD7D.8020004@redhat.com> <4D42D601.9010905@redhat.com> <4D42DC5E.8060203@redhat.com> <4D42E37B.9010207@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, aliguori@us.ibm.com, dlaor@redhat.com, ananth@in.ibm.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, mst@redhat.com, mtosatti@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, vatsa@linux.vnet.ibm.com, blauwirbel@gmail.com, ohmura.kei@lab.ntt.co.jp, avi@redhat.com, psuriset@linux.vnet.ibm.com, stefanha@linux.vnet.ibm.com To: Yoshiaki Tamura Return-path: Received: from mail-ww0-f44.google.com ([74.125.82.44]:39779 "EHLO mail-ww0-f44.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751653Ab1A2KnV (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Jan 2011 05:43:21 -0500 Received: by wwa36 with SMTP id 36so4247452wwa.1 for ; Sat, 29 Jan 2011 02:43:20 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 01/29/2011 10:31 AM, Yoshiaki Tamura wrote: > OK, then while keeping "-incoming kemari:tcp::" as a > strong solution, could you please explain why placing the original > parser under tcp handler wasn't a good idea? With that, > -incoming exec .*,ft_mode shouldn't be a problem. But a hypothetical -incoming unix.*,ft_mode would have to be implemented twice. Paolo