From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: KVM call agenda for Feb 1 Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 13:40:25 +0100 Message-ID: <4D47FF39.7060700@redhat.com> References: <4D46FB28.9040801@siemens.com> <4D472C0A.1070505@codemonkey.ws> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jan Kiszka , quintela@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm-devel To: Anthony Liguori Return-path: Received: from mail-gw0-f46.google.com ([74.125.83.46]:60830 "EHLO mail-gw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754634Ab1BAMk3 (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Feb 2011 07:40:29 -0500 Received: by gwj20 with SMTP id 20so2449739gwj.19 for ; Tue, 01 Feb 2011 04:40:28 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D472C0A.1070505@codemonkey.ws> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 01/31/2011 10:39 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: > On 01/31/2011 12:10 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> On 2011-01-31 11:02, Juan Quintela wrote: >>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested incovering. >>> >> o KVM upstream merge: status, plans, coordination > > o QMP support status for 0.14. Luiz and I already chatted about it today > but would be good to discuss in the call just to see if anyone has > opinions. Basically, declare it fully supported with a few minor caveats > (like human-monitor-passthrough is no more supported than the actual > monitor and recommendations about how to deal with devices in the device > tree). > > Reminder: tomorrow is 0.14 stable fork. Then I may add to the topics: pings of already-posted 0.14 patches. :) Paolo