From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: KVM call minutes for Feb 1 Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2011 13:36:20 +0100 Message-ID: <4D4AA144.3070005@redhat.com> References: <20110201155414.GF28968@x200.localdomain> <4D48367D.2060802@siemens.com> <20110201175336.GA22653@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Jan Kiszka , Chris Wright , kvm@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org To: Christoph Hellwig Return-path: Received: from mail-yw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.213.46]:42194 "EHLO mail-yw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752423Ab1BCMg2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Feb 2011 07:36:28 -0500 Received: by ywo7 with SMTP id 7so174663ywo.19 for ; Thu, 03 Feb 2011 04:36:27 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20110201175336.GA22653@infradead.org> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 02/01/2011 06:53 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > I'd really prefer to let you finish up all the major work that way > before starting massive revamping like the glib main loop. Yes, the glib main loop is not going to go anywhere if it cannot be applied to both qemu and qemu-kvm. (And, I believe a new main loop is a necessary condition to show that glib is bringing benefits. It's basically impossible to interface with external libraries as long as we have our own main loop). Paolo