From: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Zachary Amsden <zamsden@redhat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>, kvm <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: Convert tsc_write_lock to raw_spinlock
Date: Tue, 08 Feb 2011 10:55:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D511327.1020102@siemens.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D5109CC.2030901@redhat.com>
On 2011-02-08 10:15, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 02/07/2011 07:23 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2011-02-07 18:10, Avi Kivity wrote:
>>> On 02/07/2011 06:59 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> (well, actually, cpufreq_notifier and kvm_arch_hardware_enable are
>>>>> already non preemptible, and the stats code should just go away?)
>>>>
>>>> The stats code is trivial to convert, so it doesn't matter.
>>>
>>> Removal is easier.
>>
>> Is that stat interface no longer used?
>
> It's there for compatibility. I'm itching to remove it. See
> qemu-kvm.git/kvm/kvm_stat for the only known user, and for the
> replacement via tracepoints.
OK, but that will first take a grace period.
>
> Tracepoints have marginally lower overhead when disabled, and somewhat
> higher overhead when enabled. A disadvantage of tracepoints is that it
> is harder to associate an event with a vm when that event is triggered
> by a workqueue, but I don't think it matters in practice (kvm_stat
> doesn't even provide a per-vm breakdown).
What about using the perf infrastructure for this? Besides that perf can
reuse tracepoints, maybe there is even a more efficient way of added new
stat sources.
Jan
--
Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1
Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-08 9:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-04 9:49 [PATCH] KVM: x86: Convert tsc_write_lock to raw_spinlock Jan Kiszka
2011-02-04 21:03 ` Zachary Amsden
2011-02-07 11:35 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-02-07 14:11 ` Zachary Amsden
2011-02-07 15:00 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-02-07 15:15 ` Zachary Amsden
2011-02-07 15:38 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-02-07 15:52 ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-07 15:58 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-02-07 16:26 ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-07 16:59 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-02-07 17:10 ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-07 17:23 ` Jan Kiszka
2011-02-08 9:15 ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-08 9:55 ` Jan Kiszka [this message]
2011-02-08 9:58 ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-10 10:40 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D511327.1020102@siemens.com \
--to=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=zamsden@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).