From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call minutes for Feb 8 Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 10:44:25 +0100 Message-ID: <4D58F979.8000508@redhat.com> References: <4D52F20A.7070009@codemonkey.ws> <4D539800.3070802@codemonkey.ws> <20110210090748.GD673@redhat.com> <4D53BD22.1040800@redhat.com> <20110210111354.GA21681@redhat.com> <4D53DF42.4030700@codemonkey.ws> <20110210132730.GB24525@redhat.com> <4D53F06C.9090500@codemonkey.ws> <20110210142044.GD24525@redhat.com> <4D540CC5.2@codemonkey.ws> <4D57F96B.7010004@codemonkey.ws> <4D583793.10409@codemonkey.ws> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Blue Swirl , Chris Wright , Gleb Natapov , kvm@vger.kernel.org, Markus Armbruster , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Avi Kivity To: Anthony Liguori Return-path: Received: from mail-wy0-f174.google.com ([74.125.82.174]:64629 "EHLO mail-wy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752268Ab1BNJod (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Feb 2011 04:44:33 -0500 Received: by wyb28 with SMTP id 28so4511564wyb.19 for ; Mon, 14 Feb 2011 01:44:29 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D583793.10409@codemonkey.ws> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 02/13/2011 08:57 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: > It shouldn't be able to dead lock if the locking is designed right. As an aside, one advantage of the qemuthread wrappers is that we can add lockdep mechanisms. (It's true that these could be added to glib as well, but getting stuff into glib is a pain). Paolo