Re: nbd block device backend - 'improvements'

Avi Kivity
2011-02-15T08:41:07Z

On 02/14/2011 07:28 PM, Nicholas Thomas wrote:
> I'm interested in getting the changes merged upstream, so I thought I'd
> get in early and ask if you'd be interested in the patch, in principle;
> whether the old behaviour would need to be preserved, making the new
> behaviour accessible via a config option ("-drive
> file=nbd:127.0.0.1:5000:retry=forever,..." ?); and whether I'm going
> about the changes in a sane way (I've attached the current version of
> the patch).
>

Upstream is qemu-devel@nongnu.org, where qemu is developed. In
particular Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, the block layer maintainer.

--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function