From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Anthony Liguori Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for Feb 15 Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 07:58:42 -0600 Message-ID: <4D5A8692.2020302@codemonkey.ws> References: <20110214175652.GC21720@x200.localdomain> <4D59AA22.400@codemonkey.ws> <4D5A5904.9010706@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Chris Wright , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org To: Avi Kivity Return-path: Received: from mail-qy0-f174.google.com ([209.85.216.174]:61832 "EHLO mail-qy0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754174Ab1BON65 (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Feb 2011 08:58:57 -0500 Received: by qyj19 with SMTP id 19so2359679qyj.19 for ; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 05:58:56 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D5A5904.9010706@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 02/15/2011 04:44 AM, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 02/15/2011 12:18 AM, Anthony Liguori wrote: >> On 02/14/2011 11:56 AM, Chris Wright wrote: >>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering. >> >> -rc2 is tagged and waiting for announcement. Please take a look at >> -rc2 and make sure there is nothing critical missing. Will tag >> 0.14.0 very late tomorrow but unless there's something critical, >> it'll be 0.14.0-rc2 with an updated version. > > Aren't you going to let users play with rc2 for a week or so? If not, > what's the point? just push out 0.14.0. If you think this is worth doing, we can try for 0.15.0. But this has been the plan for 0.14.0 and I'd like to stick to the plan (for a change) :-) Regards, Anthony Liguori