From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] KVM call agenda for Feb 15 Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 16:03:17 +0200 Message-ID: <4D5A87A5.9050507@redhat.com> References: <20110214175652.GC21720@x200.localdomain> <4D59AA22.400@codemonkey.ws> <4D5A5904.9010706@redhat.com> <4D5A8692.2020302@codemonkey.ws> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Chris Wright , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org To: Anthony Liguori Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:23870 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751201Ab1BOODX (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Feb 2011 09:03:23 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4D5A8692.2020302@codemonkey.ws> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 02/15/2011 03:58 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: > On 02/15/2011 04:44 AM, Avi Kivity wrote: >> On 02/15/2011 12:18 AM, Anthony Liguori wrote: >>> On 02/14/2011 11:56 AM, Chris Wright wrote: >>>> Please send in any agenda items you are interested in covering. >>> >>> -rc2 is tagged and waiting for announcement. Please take a look at >>> -rc2 and make sure there is nothing critical missing. Will tag >>> 0.14.0 very late tomorrow but unless there's something critical, >>> it'll be 0.14.0-rc2 with an updated version. >> >> Aren't you going to let users play with rc2 for a week or so? If >> not, what's the point? just push out 0.14.0. > > If you think this is worth doing, we can try for 0.15.0. But this has > been the plan for 0.14.0 and I'd like to stick to the plan (for a > change) :-) > I'm fine either way. I just think it's strange to release an rc and a .0 back to back. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function