From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
mtosatti@redhat.com, xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] Weight-balanced tree
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2011 15:09:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D6506FB.2090809@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110222185456.22026.28200.stgit@s20.home>
On 02/22/2011 08:55 PM, Alex Williamson wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson<alex.williamson@redhat.com>
> ---
>
> include/linux/wbtree.h | 55 ++++++++++++++++
> lib/Makefile | 3 +
> lib/wbtree.c | 170 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 227 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 include/linux/wbtree.h
> create mode 100644 lib/wbtree.c
>
Andrew, can we add something like this to the tree? Can it go through
the kvm tree?
> diff --git a/include/linux/wbtree.h b/include/linux/wbtree.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..ef70f6f
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/include/linux/wbtree.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
> +/*
> + * Weight-balanced binary tree
> + *
> + * The balance of this tree is based on search probability. The
> + * heaviest weighted nodes (the ones we're most likely to hit), are
> + * at the top of each subtree.
> + *
> + * Copywrite (C) 2011 Red Hat, Inc.
> + *
> + * Authors:
> + * Alex Williamson<alex.williamson@redhat.com>
> + *
> + * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2. See
> + * the COPYING file in the top-level directory.
> + */
> +#ifndef _LINUX_WBTREE_H
> +#define _LINUX_WBTREE_H
> +
> +#include<linux/kernel.h>
> +#include<linux/stddef.h>
> +
> +struct wb_node {
> + struct wb_node *wb_parent;
> + struct wb_node *wb_left;
> + struct wb_node *wb_right;
> + unsigned long wb_weight;
> +};
> +
> +struct wb_root {
> + struct wb_node *wb_node;
> +};
> +
> +#define WB_ROOT (struct wb_root) { NULL, }
> +#define wb_entry(ptr, type, member) container_of(ptr, type, member)
> +
> +extern void wb_rebalance(struct wb_node *node, struct wb_root *root);
> +extern void wb_erase(struct wb_node *node, struct wb_root *root);
> +extern struct wb_node *wb_first(struct wb_root *root);
> +extern struct wb_node *wb_last(struct wb_root *root);
> +extern struct wb_node *wb_next(struct wb_node *node);
> +extern struct wb_node *wb_prev(struct wb_node *node);
> +
> +static inline void wb_set_weight(struct wb_node *node, unsigned long weight)
> +{
> + node->wb_weight = weight;
> +}
> +
> +static inline void wb_link_node(struct wb_node *node, struct wb_node *parent,
> + struct wb_node **wb_link)
> +{
> + node->wb_left = node->wb_right = NULL;
> + node->wb_parent = parent;
> + *wb_link = node;
> +}
> +#endif /* _LINUX_WBTREE_H */
> diff --git a/lib/Makefile b/lib/Makefile
> index cbb774f..5c42e63 100644
> --- a/lib/Makefile
> +++ b/lib/Makefile
> @@ -21,7 +21,8 @@ lib-y += kobject.o kref.o klist.o
>
> obj-y += bcd.o div64.o sort.o parser.o halfmd4.o debug_locks.o random32.o \
> bust_spinlocks.o hexdump.o kasprintf.o bitmap.o scatterlist.o \
> - string_helpers.o gcd.o lcm.o list_sort.o uuid.o flex_array.o
> + string_helpers.o gcd.o lcm.o list_sort.o uuid.o flex_array.o \
> + wbtree.o
>
obj-$(CONFIG_WEIGHT_BALANCED_TREE) += wbtree.o
then kvm can select it, and the impact on non-kvm kernels is removed.
> ifeq ($(CONFIG_DEBUG_KOBJECT),y)
> CFLAGS_kobject.o += -DDEBUG
> diff --git a/lib/wbtree.c b/lib/wbtree.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..54c3817
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/lib/wbtree.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,170 @@
> +/*
> + * Weight-balanced binary tree
> + *
> + * The balance of this tree is based on search probability. The
> + * heaviest weighted nodes (the ones we're most likely to hit), are
> + * at the top of each subtree.
> + *
> + * Copywrite (C) 2011 Red Hat, Inc.
> + *
> + * Authors:
> + * Alex Williamson<alex.williamson@redhat.com>
> + *
> + * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2. See
> + * the COPYING file in the top-level directory.
> + */
> +#include<linux/wbtree.h>
> +#include<linux/module.h>
> +
> +static void __wb_rotate_left(struct wb_node *node, struct wb_root *root)
> +{
> + struct wb_node *right = node->wb_right;
> + struct wb_node *parent = node->wb_parent;
> +
> + if ((node->wb_right = right->wb_left))
> + right->wb_left->wb_parent = node;
> + right->wb_left = node;
> +
> + right->wb_parent = parent;
> +
> + if (parent) {
> + if (node == parent->wb_left)
> + parent->wb_left = right;
> + else
> + parent->wb_right = right;
> + } else
> + root->wb_node = right;
> +
> + node->wb_parent = right;
> +}
> +
> +static void __wb_rotate_right(struct wb_node *node, struct wb_root *root)
> +{
> + struct wb_node *left = node->wb_left;
> + struct wb_node *parent = node->wb_parent;
> +
> + if ((node->wb_left = left->wb_right))
> + left->wb_right->wb_parent = node;
> + left->wb_right = node;
> +
> + left->wb_parent = parent;
> +
> + if (parent) {
> + if (node == parent->wb_right)
> + parent->wb_right = left;
> + else
> + parent->wb_left = left;
> + } else
> + root->wb_node = left;
> +
> + node->wb_parent = left;
> +}
> +
> +void wb_rebalance(struct wb_node *node, struct wb_root *root)
> +{
> + while (node->wb_parent&& node->wb_parent->wb_weight< node->wb_weight) {
> + if (node == node->wb_parent->wb_left)
> + __wb_rotate_right(node->wb_parent, root);
> + else
> + __wb_rotate_left(node->wb_parent, root);
> + }
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(wb_rebalance);
> +
> +void wb_erase(struct wb_node *node, struct wb_root *root)
> +{
> + while (node->wb_left || node->wb_right) {
> + if (!node->wb_left)
> + __wb_rotate_left(node, root);
> + else if (!node->wb_right)
> + __wb_rotate_right(node, root);
> + else {
> + if (node->wb_left->wb_weight>
> + node->wb_right->wb_weight)
> + __wb_rotate_right(node, root);
> + else
> + __wb_rotate_left(node, root);
> + }
> + }
> +
> + if (node->wb_parent) {
> + if (node->wb_parent->wb_left == node)
> + node->wb_parent->wb_left = NULL;
> + else
> + node->wb_parent->wb_right = NULL;
> + } else
> + root->wb_node = NULL;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(wb_erase);
> +
> +struct wb_node *wb_first(struct wb_root *root)
> +{
> + struct wb_node *node;
> +
> + node = root->wb_node;
> + if (!node)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + while (node->wb_left)
> + node = node->wb_left;
> +
> + return node;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(wb_first);
> +
> +struct wb_node *wb_last(struct wb_root *root)
> +{
> + struct wb_node *node;
> +
> + node = root->wb_node;
> + if (!node)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + while (node->wb_right)
> + node = node->wb_right;
> +
> + return node;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(wb_last);
> +
> +struct wb_node *wb_next(struct wb_node *node)
> +{
> + struct wb_node *parent;
> +
> + if (node->wb_parent == node)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + if (node->wb_right) {
> + node = node->wb_right;
> + while (node->wb_left)
> + node = node->wb_left;
> + return node;
> + }
> +
> + while ((parent = node->wb_parent)&& node == parent->wb_right)
> + node = parent;
> +
> + return parent;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(wb_next);
> +
> +struct wb_node *wb_prev(struct wb_node *node)
> +{
> + struct wb_node *parent;
> +
> + if (node->wb_parent == node)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + if (node->wb_left) {
> + node = node->wb_left;
> + while (node->wb_right)
> + node = node->wb_right;
> + return node;
> + }
> +
> + while ((parent = node->wb_parent)&& node == parent->wb_left)
> + node = parent;
> +
> + return parent;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(wb_prev);
>
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-23 13:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-22 8:08 [PATCH 0/7] KVM: optimize memslots searching and cache GPN to GFN Xiao Guangrong
2011-02-22 8:09 ` [PATCH 1/7] KVM: cleanup memslot_id function Xiao Guangrong
2011-02-22 8:10 ` [PATCH 2/7] KVM: introduce KVM_MEM_SLOTS_NUM macro Xiao Guangrong
2011-02-22 8:11 ` [PATCH 1/3] KVM: introduce memslots_updated function Xiao Guangrong
2011-02-22 8:12 ` [PATCH 4/7] KVM: sort memslots and use binary search to search the right slot Xiao Guangrong
2011-02-22 14:25 ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-22 14:54 ` Alex Williamson
2011-02-22 18:54 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] Weight-balanced binary tree + KVM growable memory slots using wbtree Alex Williamson
2011-02-22 18:55 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] Weight-balanced tree Alex Williamson
2011-02-23 13:09 ` Avi Kivity [this message]
2011-02-23 17:02 ` Alex Williamson
2011-02-23 17:08 ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-23 20:19 ` Alex Williamson
2011-02-24 23:04 ` Andrew Morton
2011-02-22 18:55 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] kvm: Allow memory slot array to grow on demand Alex Williamson
2011-02-24 10:39 ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-24 18:08 ` Alex Williamson
2011-02-27 9:44 ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-22 18:55 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] kvm: Use weight-balanced tree for memory slot management Alex Williamson
2011-02-22 18:59 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] Weight-balanced binary tree + KVM growable memory slots using wbtree Alex Williamson
2011-02-23 1:56 ` Alex Williamson
2011-02-23 13:12 ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-23 18:06 ` Alex Williamson
2011-02-23 19:28 ` Alex Williamson
2011-02-24 10:06 ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-24 17:35 ` Alex Williamson
2011-02-27 9:54 ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-28 23:04 ` Alex Williamson
2011-03-01 15:03 ` Avi Kivity
2011-03-01 18:20 ` Alex Williamson
2011-03-02 13:31 ` Avi Kivity
2011-03-01 19:47 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2011-03-02 13:34 ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-24 10:04 ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-23 1:30 ` [PATCH 4/7] KVM: sort memslots and use binary search to search the right slot Xiao Guangrong
2011-02-22 8:13 ` [PATCH 5/7] KVM: cache the last used slot Xiao Guangrong
2011-02-22 14:26 ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-22 8:15 ` [PATCH 6/7] KVM: cleanup traversal used slots Xiao Guangrong
2011-02-22 8:16 ` [PATCH 7/7] KVM: MMU: cache guest page number to guest frame number Xiao Guangrong
2011-02-22 14:32 ` Avi Kivity
2011-02-23 1:38 ` Xiao Guangrong
2011-02-23 9:28 ` Avi Kivity
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4D6506FB.2090809@redhat.com \
--to=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).