From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm: improve comment on rcu use in irqfd_deassign
Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2011 14:36:19 +0200
Message-ID: <4D737FC3.9090801@redhat.com>
References: <20110306110326.GA23818@redhat.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20110306110326.GA23818@redhat.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org

On 03/06/2011 01:03 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> The RCU use in kvm_irqfd_deassign is tricky: we have rcu_assign_pointer
> but no synchronize_rcu: synchronize_rcu is done by kvm_irq_routing_update
> which we share a spinlock with.
>
> Fix up a comment in an attempt to make this clearer.

Applied, thanks.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function