From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Zachary Amsden Subject: Re: regression - 2.6.36 -> 2.6.37 - kvm - 32bit SMP guests don't boot Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2011 09:53:35 -0500 Message-ID: <4D739FEF.7000502@redhat.com> References: <20110303210647.GA27691@nik-comp.lan> <4D700F09.9000002@redhat.com> <20110303220155.GB27691@nik-comp.lan> <4D7101AF.6060009@redhat.com> <20110304182733.GA2867@nik-comp.lan> <1299265762.11618.140.camel@mothafucka.localdomain> <20110304205512.GB2867@nik-comp.lan> <1299274906.11618.157.camel@mothafucka.localdomain> <20110304223640.GC2867@nik-comp.lan> <4D718F2D.6080105@redhat.com> <20110305072115.GA2166@nik-comp.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Glauber Costa , Avi Kivity , Nikola Ciprich , KVM list , Linux kernel list To: Nikola Ciprich Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20110305072115.GA2166@nik-comp.lan> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On 03/05/2011 02:21 AM, Nikola Ciprich wrote: > >> Can you try this patch to see if it fixes the problem? >> > You haven't read my replies, did you? ;-) > kvm_request_guest_time_update seems to have been > removed, and kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_CLOCK_UPDATE, vcpu) > seems to be used instead, adding it fixes the problem. > That's what I was going to use in the patch... :) > I did read your mail, but I was working on an old tree... because of that transformation, this fix will unfortunately have to be back and forward ported by hand. Did you try just that change right applied on top of the patch (e48672fa25e879f7ae21785c7efd187738139593) implicated by bisect? It will be great to know if that change alone fixes the problem, if so, the fix you propose is probably the right one for upstream. Thanks, Zach