From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Paolo Bonzini Subject: Re: KVM call minutes for Mar 8 Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2011 17:58:39 +0100 Message-ID: <4D76603F.2090905@redhat.com> References: <20110308155024.GA10392@x200.localdomain> <4D765E77.4020406@siemens.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Chris Wright , kvm@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org To: Jan Kiszka Return-path: Received: from mail-yw0-f46.google.com ([209.85.213.46]:56231 "EHLO mail-yw0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754587Ab1CHQ6r (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Mar 2011 11:58:47 -0500 Received: by ywj3 with SMTP id 3so2053499ywj.19 for ; Tue, 08 Mar 2011 08:58:46 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D765E77.4020406@siemens.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 03/08/2011 05:51 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> > iothread merge? >> > - progressing slowly, marcelo working on it >> > - have found regressions (signal handling code) (ifdef'd away for now) > The regressions will automagically go away (to be replaced with others > then...) when the switch of qemu-kvm to upstream bits is performed. They > were related to qemu-kvm implementing iothread on top of non-threaded > qemu and /me not looking careful enough on the implications. The qemu.git bit seen with my win32 patch series should also be a regression from qemu-kvm.git to qemu.git, no? (Sorry, not on the call today). Paolo