From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jan Kiszka Subject: Re: KVM call minutes for Mar 8 Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2011 18:10:19 +0100 Message-ID: <4D7662FB.2060000@siemens.com> References: <20110308155024.GA10392@x200.localdomain> <4D765E77.4020406@siemens.com> <4D76603F.2090905@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Chris Wright , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" To: Paolo Bonzini Return-path: Received: from thoth.sbs.de ([192.35.17.2]:22509 "EHLO thoth.sbs.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754587Ab1CHRKg (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Mar 2011 12:10:36 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4D76603F.2090905@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 2011-03-08 17:58, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 03/08/2011 05:51 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >>>> iothread merge? >>>> - progressing slowly, marcelo working on it >>>> - have found regressions (signal handling code) (ifdef'd away for now) >> The regressions will automagically go away (to be replaced with others >> then...) when the switch of qemu-kvm to upstream bits is performed. They >> were related to qemu-kvm implementing iothread on top of non-threaded >> qemu and /me not looking careful enough on the implications. > > The qemu.git bit seen with my win32 patch series should also be a > regression from qemu-kvm.git to qemu.git, no? Can't follow. What do you mean? Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1 Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux