From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: KVM call minutes for Mar 8
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2011 18:15:01 +0100
Message-ID: <4D766415.2090702@redhat.com>
References: <20110308155024.GA10392@x200.localdomain> <4D765E77.4020406@siemens.com> <4D76603F.2090905@redhat.com> <4D7662FB.2060000@siemens.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Chris Wright <chrisw@redhat.com>,
	"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	"qemu-devel@nongnu.org" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
To: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:12734 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1755156Ab1CHRPI (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 8 Mar 2011 12:15:08 -0500
In-Reply-To: <4D7662FB.2060000@siemens.com>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On 03/08/2011 06:10 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >  The qemu.git bit seen with my win32 patch series should also be a
> >  regression from qemu-kvm.git to qemu.git, no?
>
> Can't follow. What do you mean?

I didn't understand very well Avi and Marcelo's exchange, but this test 
definitely 1) fails with qemu iothread, 2) works with qemu non-iothread. 
  What I didn't understand is whether it works with qemu-kvm.

Paolo