From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: KVM call minutes for Mar 8 Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2011 19:40:24 +0200 Message-ID: <4D766A08.50109@redhat.com> References: <20110308155024.GA10392@x200.localdomain> <4D765E77.4020406@siemens.com> <4D76603F.2090905@redhat.com> <4D7662FB.2060000@siemens.com> <4D766415.2090702@redhat.com> <4D766583.9040507@siemens.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Paolo Bonzini , Chris Wright , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , Marcelo Tosatti To: Jan Kiszka Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:49805 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751471Ab1CHRkd (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Mar 2011 12:40:33 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4D766583.9040507@siemens.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 03/08/2011 07:21 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: > On 2011-03-08 18:15, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > On 03/08/2011 06:10 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: > >>> The qemu.git bit seen with my win32 patch series should also be a > >>> regression from qemu-kvm.git to qemu.git, no? > >> > >> Can't follow. What do you mean? > > > > I didn't understand very well Avi and Marcelo's exchange, but this test > > definitely 1) fails with qemu iothread, 2) works with qemu non-iothread. > > What I didn't understand is whether it works with qemu-kvm. That was Paolo's patchset which I tested, yes? I wasn't talking about that in the call. > Are we talking about the failing Fedora installations? Or something else? Something else - 27f368604a3d27ca4d. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function