From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: KVM call minutes for Mar 8 Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2011 19:41:17 +0200 Message-ID: <4D766A3D.90305@redhat.com> References: <20110308155024.GA10392@x200.localdomain> <4D765E77.4020406@siemens.com> <4D76603F.2090905@redhat.com> <4D7662FB.2060000@siemens.com> <4D766415.2090702@redhat.com> <4D766583.9040507@siemens.com> <4D766A08.50109@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Paolo Bonzini , Chris Wright , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , Marcelo Tosatti To: Jan Kiszka Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:27077 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755680Ab1CHRlX (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Mar 2011 12:41:23 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4D766A08.50109@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 03/08/2011 07:40 PM, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 03/08/2011 07:21 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> On 2011-03-08 18:15, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> > On 03/08/2011 06:10 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> >>> The qemu.git bit seen with my win32 patch series should also be a >> >>> regression from qemu-kvm.git to qemu.git, no? >> >> >> >> Can't follow. What do you mean? >> > >> > I didn't understand very well Avi and Marcelo's exchange, but this >> test >> > definitely 1) fails with qemu iothread, 2) works with qemu >> non-iothread. >> > What I didn't understand is whether it works with qemu-kvm. > > That was Paolo's patchset which I tested, yes? I wasn't talking about > that in the call. Of course, this is an important issue in its own right. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function