From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jan Kiszka Subject: Re: KVM call minutes for Mar 8 Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2011 18:43:48 +0100 Message-ID: <4D766AD4.5090606@siemens.com> References: <20110308155024.GA10392@x200.localdomain> <4D765E77.4020406@siemens.com> <4D76603F.2090905@redhat.com> <4D7662FB.2060000@siemens.com> <4D766415.2090702@redhat.com> <4D766583.9040507@siemens.com> <4D766A08.50109@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Paolo Bonzini , Chris Wright , "kvm@vger.kernel.org" , "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" , Marcelo Tosatti To: Avi Kivity Return-path: Received: from david.siemens.de ([192.35.17.14]:16587 "EHLO david.siemens.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755629Ab1CHRoE (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Mar 2011 12:44:04 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4D766A08.50109@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 2011-03-08 18:40, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 03/08/2011 07:21 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> On 2011-03-08 18:15, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >>> On 03/08/2011 06:10 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >>>>> The qemu.git bit seen with my win32 patch series should also be a >>>>> regression from qemu-kvm.git to qemu.git, no? >>>> >>>> Can't follow. What do you mean? >>> >>> I didn't understand very well Avi and Marcelo's exchange, but this test >>> definitely 1) fails with qemu iothread, 2) works with qemu non-iothread. >>> What I didn't understand is whether it works with qemu-kvm. > > That was Paolo's patchset which I tested, yes? I wasn't talking about > that in the call. > >> Are we talking about the failing Fedora installations? Or something else? > > Something else - 27f368604a3d27ca4d. I already thought so. But that is understood, fixed, and will be obsoleted by the merge. More interesting are open issues. Any news from that front? Jan -- Siemens AG, Corporate Technology, CT T DE IT 1 Corporate Competence Center Embedded Linux