From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: 2.6.38-rc6: general protection error inside KVM 64 bits guest Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 11:26:27 +0200 Message-ID: <4D7747C3.1070807@redhat.com> References: <20110306124238.GC25565@redhat.com> <4D738435.1030906@redhat.com> <20110306143503.GD25565@redhat.com> <4D73A1EA.1060702@redhat.com> <4D73A368.9040702@redhat.com> <20110309092520.GC10151@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Francis Moreau , kvm@vger.kernel.org To: Gleb Natapov Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:46296 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756873Ab1CIJ0b (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Mar 2011 04:26:31 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20110309092520.GC10151@redhat.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 03/09/2011 11:25 AM, Gleb Natapov wrote: > On Wed, Mar 09, 2011 at 08:05:54AM +0100, Francis Moreau wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Avi Kivity wrote: > > > On 03/06/2011 05:02 PM, Avi Kivity wrote: > > >> > > >> (for #TS we need additional logic... will this arch never end?) > > >> > > > > > > Actually these instructions don't generate #TS. > > > > > > > I just wanted to know if this issue is going to be fixed before 2.6.38 is out ? > > > I posted updated patches. It is up to maintainers to decide if the > patches should be included in 2.6.38 at such late rc stage. Probably not. The problematic case is not very mainstream. We'll merge it into 2.6.39 and backport into 2.6.38.1. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function