From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: 2.6.38-rc6: general protection error inside KVM 64 bits guest Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 11:29:30 +0200 Message-ID: <4D77487A.5060803@redhat.com> References: <20110306124238.GC25565@redhat.com> <4D738435.1030906@redhat.com> <20110306143503.GD25565@redhat.com> <4D73A1EA.1060702@redhat.com> <4D73A368.9040702@redhat.com> <20110309092520.GC10151@redhat.com> <4D7747C3.1070807@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Gleb Natapov , kvm@vger.kernel.org To: Francis Moreau Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:7030 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752169Ab1CIJ3g (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Mar 2011 04:29:36 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 03/09/2011 11:28 AM, Francis Moreau wrote: > > Probably not. The problematic case is not very mainstream. > > > > We'll merge it into 2.6.39 and backport into 2.6.38.1. > > maybe 2.6.35.x too ? > It will eventually trickle down to all maintained stable series. -- error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function