From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: KVM call agenda for Mars 14th
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 14:50:40 +0100
Message-ID: <4D7F6EB0.6060802@redhat.com>
References: <m3mxkxhpb0.fsf@trasno.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: kvm-devel <kvm@vger.kernel.org>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
To: quintela@redhat.com
Return-path: <kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mail-gx0-f174.google.com ([209.85.161.174]:47103 "EHLO
	mail-gx0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1754068Ab1CONuo (ORCPT <rfc822;kvm@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 15 Mar 2011 09:50:44 -0400
Received: by gxk21 with SMTP id 21so232313gxk.19
        for <kvm@vger.kernel.org>; Tue, 15 Mar 2011 06:50:43 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <m3mxkxhpb0.fsf@trasno.org>
Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <kvm.vger.kernel.org>

On 03/14/2011 01:14 PM, Juan Quintela wrote:
>
> Please send any agenda items you are interested in covering.

Switching from gPXE to iPXE.  Fedora could lead the switch if it gets 
some commitment from QEMU to switch in 0.15 too (assuming the switch is 
successful).  See also https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=684792

The only downside I see is that iPXE doesn't have a stable release.

Paolo