public inbox for kvm@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
Cc: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: MMU: remove mmu_seq verification on pte write path
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 10:29:27 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D8FF287.1040300@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)

The mmu_seq verification can be removed since we get the pfn in the
protection of mmu_lock

Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h |    2 +-
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c              |   16 +++++-----------
 arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h      |    4 +---
 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
index 35f81b1..ea9fea3 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
@@ -258,7 +258,7 @@ struct kvm_mmu {
 			 struct kvm_mmu_page *sp);
 	void (*invlpg)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t gva);
 	void (*update_pte)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
-			u64 *spte, const void *pte, unsigned long mmu_seq);
+			   u64 *spte, const void *pte);
 	hpa_t root_hpa;
 	int root_level;
 	int shadow_root_level;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
index 22fae75..2841805 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -1206,7 +1206,7 @@ static void nonpaging_invlpg(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t gva)
 
 static void nonpaging_update_pte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 				 struct kvm_mmu_page *sp, u64 *spte,
-				 const void *pte, unsigned long mmu_seq)
+				 const void *pte)
 {
 	WARN_ON(1);
 }
@@ -3163,9 +3163,8 @@ static void mmu_pte_write_zap_pte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
 }
 
 static void mmu_pte_write_new_pte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
-				  struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
-				  u64 *spte,
-				  const void *new, unsigned long mmu_seq)
+				  struct kvm_mmu_page *sp, u64 *spte,
+				  const void *new)
 {
 	if (sp->role.level != PT_PAGE_TABLE_LEVEL) {
 		++vcpu->kvm->stat.mmu_pde_zapped;
@@ -3173,7 +3172,7 @@ static void mmu_pte_write_new_pte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
         }
 
 	++vcpu->kvm->stat.mmu_pte_updated;
-	vcpu->arch.mmu.update_pte(vcpu, sp, spte, new, mmu_seq);
+	vcpu->arch.mmu.update_pte(vcpu, sp, spte, new);
 }
 
 static bool need_remote_flush(u64 old, u64 new)
@@ -3229,7 +3228,6 @@ void kvm_mmu_pte_write(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa,
 	struct kvm_mmu_page *sp;
 	struct hlist_node *node;
 	LIST_HEAD(invalid_list);
-	unsigned long mmu_seq;
 	u64 entry, gentry, *spte;
 	unsigned pte_size, page_offset, misaligned, quadrant, offset;
 	int level, npte, invlpg_counter, r, flooded = 0;
@@ -3271,9 +3269,6 @@ void kvm_mmu_pte_write(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa,
 		break;
 	}
 
-	mmu_seq = vcpu->kvm->mmu_notifier_seq;
-	smp_rmb();
-
 	spin_lock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock);
 	if (atomic_read(&vcpu->kvm->arch.invlpg_counter) != invlpg_counter)
 		gentry = 0;
@@ -3345,8 +3340,7 @@ void kvm_mmu_pte_write(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t gpa,
 			if (gentry &&
 			      !((sp->role.word ^ vcpu->arch.mmu.base_role.word)
 			      & mask.word))
-				mmu_pte_write_new_pte(vcpu, sp, spte, &gentry,
-						      mmu_seq);
+				mmu_pte_write_new_pte(vcpu, sp, spte, &gentry);
 			if (!remote_flush && need_remote_flush(entry, *spte))
 				remote_flush = true;
 			++spte;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h b/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h
index c639779..74f8567 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/paging_tmpl.h
@@ -325,7 +325,7 @@ no_present:
 }
 
 static void FNAME(update_pte)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
-			      u64 *spte, const void *pte, unsigned long mmu_seq)
+			      u64 *spte, const void *pte)
 {
 	pt_element_t gpte;
 	unsigned pte_access;
@@ -342,8 +342,6 @@ static void FNAME(update_pte)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
 		kvm_release_pfn_clean(pfn);
 		return;
 	}
-	if (mmu_notifier_retry(vcpu, mmu_seq))
-		return;
 
 	/*
 	 * we call mmu_set_spte() with host_writable = true because that
-- 
1.7.4

             reply	other threads:[~2011-03-28  2:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-03-28  2:29 Xiao Guangrong [this message]
2011-03-28  2:30 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: MMU: optimize pte write path if don't have protected sp Xiao Guangrong
2011-04-05  8:34   ` Avi Kivity
2011-04-05  8:35 ` [PATCH 1/2] KVM: MMU: remove mmu_seq verification on pte write path Avi Kivity

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4D8FF287.1040300@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=xiaoguangrong@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --cc=avi@redhat.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox