From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Avi Kivity Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] Native Linux KVM tool Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2011 11:24:24 +0300 Message-ID: <4D982EB8.7080001@redhat.com> References: <1301592656.586.15.camel@jaguar> <4D978930.1000909@codemonkey.ws> <20110403062117.GA27121@elte.hu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Anthony Liguori , Pekka Enberg , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, aarcange@redhat.com, mtosatti@redhat.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, joro@8bytes.org, penberg@cs.helsinki.fi, asias.hejun@gmail.com, gorcunov@gmail.com To: Ingo Molnar Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20110403062117.GA27121@elte.hu> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: kvm.vger.kernel.org On 04/03/2011 09:21 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote: > * Anthony Liguori wrote: > > > On 03/31/2011 12:30 PM, Pekka Enberg wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > > > We=E2=80=99re proud to announce the native Linux KVM tool! > > > > Neat! > > > > As something of a lesson of history, I'd suggest picking a more un= ique name > > while it's still a prototype :-) > > I disagree, i find it pretty handy and intuitive to run 'kvm ./disk.i= mg' to > boot KVM and this particular tool name has not been taken yet either. Some distributions install qemu-kvm as /usr/bin/kvm. > perf uses a similar concept: the kernel subsystem is generally called= 'perf', > and the (Linux specific) user-space tool is called 'perf' as well. It= makes > quite a bit of sense. Well, this is bound to cause confusion as the tool is yet quite immatur= e. --=20 error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function